Seventh Day Adventist Relationship to Ellen G White
By
Hiram E. Sutton
Introduction
To
those of you who are of the 'Seventh Day Adventist' persuasion I
ask you to prayerfully consider the contents of this article. I
have taken the time to document my findings via direct links so
that you may go back and validate what I have typed from SDA
official documents
and other sources. My intent is to be as objective as possible
by not interjecting personal opinion and to provide a basis for
an objective assessment of "Seventh Day Adventism". An
assessment I encourage you to take, your eternal salvation may
depend on it.
In addition this article is not meant to
be an exhaustive critique into the Seventh Day Adventist
organization and their beliefs but to demonstrate that there is
amble evidence to warrant that one take a closer look at
what the SDA is teaching their followers who attend their churches. One must be careful not to follow any
teaching that takes verses out of content and or twist verses to
make them fit a particular belief system. Keep in
mind the Bible exhorts us to:
1 John 4:1
1
Beloved, do not believe
every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from
God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world.
1Thess 5:21 21 But examine everything
carefully; hold fast to that which is good; 22 abstain from every form of
evil.
And the Bible warns us that: Isaiah 8:20
20 To the law and to
the testimony! If they do not speak according to this word, they
have no light of dawn.
There is controversy as to whether or not the Seventh Day Adventist should be considered
orthodox or a cult.
Some within evangelical circles consider them to be cultic.
The controversy is fueled by the fact that the
Seventh Day Adventist organization refuses to part waters with the heretical teachings of Ellen G. White.
This connection is clearly seen in their official doctrinal Statements
which is addressed later in the article
Historical Overview
Seven day Adventist developed out of the Millerite
movement organized by William Miller in the 1840's. William Miller was a
former Baptist preacher who formed his own religious views, stating that
all churches had become apostate and were "Babylon," that all Christians
were to leave those churches and join his movement, and that the second
coming, or the advent, of Jesus Christ was imminent. He (William
Miller) developed a
teaching in which he claimed that he knew the exact
year and day in
which Jesus Christ would return. Ellen G. Harmon (later Ellen G. White)
became a member and follower of the Millerite movement....[1]
Miller was an active Freemason: "It was here
[Poultney, Vermont] that Mr. Miller became a member of the Masonic
fraternity, in which his perseverance, if nothing else, was manifested;
for he advanced to the highest degree which the lodges then held to in the
country, or in that region, could confer."[2]
..."Most followers of the original
Millerite movement disbanded, but small groups continued which were
not directly connected with or under the authority of William Miller.
One of those groups included Ellen G. Harmon (White).
Ellen G. Harmon (White) continued
with the group with which she was affiliated and later met James White.
They married in 1846 and with the union and the continuing visions of
Ellen G. White, they were established as the leaders of what had become
a revised Adventist movement and foundation of current Seventh-day
Adventist theology. Seventh-day Adventist theology has very deep roots
in the Millerite movement, but has progressed far beyond those basic
teachings as a result of the visions claimed by Ellen G. White."
[1]
Today the the Seventh Day Adventist is composed of two divisions (1)
Seventh Day Adventist and (2)
Seventh Day
Adventist Reformed .The
'Seventh Day Adventist Reformed' was formed in July 1925 as a result of
an internal dispute as to whether one should serve in World
War 1[3]
or any war.
Ellen G Harmon (White)
One
cannot properly examine the seventh day Adventist organization without
gaining an understanding of one of it's most controversial founders, Ellen G Harmon
(White). Ellen G Harmon was born Nov. 26, 1827,
Gorham, Maine, U.S.
died July 16, 1915, St. Helena, California under the married name of Ellen G
White.
Ellen Harmon sustained a serious
injury when she
was nine years old, an angry schoolmate threw a stone, which struck her
on the nose and caused significant injury. Some have alleged that this
blow so severely damaged the temporal lobe of her brain as to cause her
to have a type of epilepsy known as partial complex seizures (also
called complex partial seizures). Thus, it is argued, that her visions were
not divine revelations from God, but due to temporal lobe epilepsy.[4].
More can be read about how this injury affected her from a medical point
of view written by Donald I. Peterson, MD at (1)
http://www.whiteestate.org/issues/visions.html#injury and (2)
the article written by Doug Hackleman, Editor, Adventist Currents, June
1985 at
http://www.ellenwhiteexposed.com/headinjury.htm.
Her education ended with a brief period at
the Westbrook Seminary and Female College of Portland, Maine, in 1839.
The following year she underwent a religious experience at a Methodist
camp meeting, and she was baptized in 1842. A short time later she
followed her family in becoming a follower of William Miller, the
Adventist prophet who was preaching the imminent return of Christ (fixed
for October 22, 1844). Undismayed later by the apparent failure of
Miller’s prophecy, Harmon retained the Adventist view.[5]
The Place of Ellen G White in 21st Century
Seventh Day Adventist
Both the Seventh Day Adventist and the Reformed Adventist hold Ellen G. White
in high regard and acknowledge her as having the Biblical gift of prophecy as
stated in the following belief statement of both groups. Thought the claim is
White's writing is the lesser light that leads to the greater light
which is scripture,
18. The Gift of Prophecy: One of the gifts of the Holy Spirit is
prophecy. This gift is an identifying mark of the remnant church
and was manifested in the ministry of Ellen. G. White. As the
Lord's messenger, her writings are a continuing and
authoritative source of truth which provide for the church
comfort, guidance, instruction, and correction. They also make
clear that the Bible is the standard by which all teaching and
experience must be tested. (Joel 2:28, 29; Acts 2:14-21; Heb.
1:1-3; Rev. 12:17; 19:10.)
....The Gift of
Prophecy
The gifts of the Spirit are to be restored to
the faithful remnant before the second coming of Jesus. 1
Corinthians 1:7, 8.
In keeping with the promise of God, the gift
of prophecy was restored to the true church in these last days.
Joel 2:28; Acts 2:14-21; Revelation 12:17 (cf Revelation 19:10).
Soon after the second great disappointment in 1844, Ellen G.
White was called of God to the prophetic ministry among the
early Adventists, and her work has stood the test of Isaiah 8:20
and Matthew 7:16, 20.
The main purpose of Ellen G. White's writings
is to bring men and women back to the neglected Word of God,
impressing upon their hearts the truths already revealed in the
Bible, and to keep believers from drifting away from these
truths....
The Prophecies / Visions of Ellen G White
When one looks at the prophecies / revelations of Ellen White
objectively, from a Biblical view, one has to keep in mind what is said
in the following passages. A person obedient to the word of God will
heed its warnings.
Deut 18:20-22
20‘But the prophet
who speaks a word presumptuously in My name which I have
not commanded him to speak, or which he speaks in the name
of other gods, that prophet shall die.’
21“You may
say in your heart, ‘How will we know the word which the
Lord
has not spoken?’
22“When a
prophet speaks in the name of the Lord,
if the thing does not come about or come true, that is the
thing which the Lord
has not spoken. The prophet has spoken it presumptuously; you shall
not be afraid of him.
Ellen White is on record for giving the following revelations in her
writings that are attributed to her so called "Testimonies For The Church" In her
Testimonies" she puts her revelations on
par with scripture by claiming her revelations where directly from God.
The below chart is not meant to be exhaustive but to reflect the issue at hand
concerning EGW revelations and visions in contrast to scriptural
teaching.
It is
contradictory and at worst deceptive to claim that the Bible has the last word, which
has the Holy Spirit as its author and then claim Ellen G. White
as having the gift of prophecy from God, yet her
prophesies contradict what the
scriptures say. Biblical prophets who spoke under the inspiration of the
Holy Spirit (2Pet 1:20-21; Heb 1:1) never spoke contradictory to the word of
God which also originated from the Holy Spirit. This was only true of false prophets.
Ellen G White's
Testimonies for the Church Reference
"...Soon
we heard the voice of God like many
waters, which gave us the day and hour of Jesus' coming.
The living saints, 144,000 in number, knew and understood the
voice, while the wicked thought it was thunder and an
earthquake. When God spake the time,.."
The 144,000 were all sealed and perfectly
united. On their foreheads were the words God, New Jerusalem,
and a glorious star containing Jesus' new name. At our happy,
holy state the wicked were enraged, and would rush violently up
to lay hands on us to thrust us into prison, when we would
stretch forth the hand in the name of the Lord, and they would
fall helpless to the ground. Then it was that the synagogue of
Satan knew that God had loved us, who could wash one another's
feet, and salute the brethren with a holy kiss, and they
worshiped at our feet.
Mark 13:32–37
32
“But of that day or hour no
one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but the
Father alone. 33“Take
heed, keep on the alert; for you do not know when the appointed time will
come. 34“It is like a
man away on a journey, who
upon leaving his house and putting his slaves in charge,
assigning to each one
his task, also commanded the doorkeeper to stay on the alert.
35“Therefore, be on the alert—for you do not know when the
master of the house is coming, whether in the evening, at
midnight, or when the rooster crows, or in the morning— 36in case he should come suddenly and find you asleep. 37“What I say to you I say to all, ‘Be on the alert!’ ”
The privileges of Ellen G White to have divine things
revealed to her exceeds that of Jesus himself. For she has been privileged to know the day and
hour. This blatantly contradicts scripture.
"...and
they worshiped at our feet. " The other point of
note is that Mrs. White has humans receiving worship, no where
in scripture is this permitted. Whether to men (Acts 10:25-26)
or angels(Acts 22:8-9). To do so, is disobedience to God
by violating the ten commandments (Ex 20:5)
In 1876 EGWStated - "In ancient times God spoke to men by the mouth
of prophets and apostles.
In these days He speaks to them by the Testimonies of His
Spirit."
Here EGW states that, "In ancient
times God spoke to men by the mouth of prophets and apostles.
In these days He speaks
to them by the Testimonies of His Spirit."
By
making this statement she has
placed herself above the person of Christ as God's revelation to
men.
In addition she has placed herself on par with the
prophets and apostles as men in which the revelation of God
came.
By doing the before
mentioned she places herself in
direct contradiction to the scriptures which say:
Heb 1:1-2 1
God, after He spoke long ago to the fathers in the prophets in
many portions and in many ways, 2in these last days has spoken to us in His Son, whom He
appointed heir of all things, through whom also He made the
world.
In 1882 EGW
stated - "If you lessen the confidence of
God's people
in the testimonies He has sent them, you are
rebelling against God as certainly as were
Korah, Dathan, and Abiram."
Here
EGW uses intimidation and guilt against those who take issue
against those who are in disagreement with her testimonies for
the church by accusing them as being in rebellion against God
and equating them with rebellious person as mentioned in
scripture (Korah, Dathan, and Abiram).
EGW stated,
"In the typical service the high priest, having made the
atonement for Israel, came forth and blessed the congregation.
So Christ, at the close of His work as mediator, will appear,
"without sin unto salvation" (Hebrews 9:28), to bless His
waiting people with eternal life. As the priest, in removing the
sins from the sanctuary, confessed them upon the head of the
scapegoat, so Christ will place all these sins upon Satan,
the originator and instigator of sin. The scapegoat, bearing the
sins of Israel, was sent away "unto a land not inhabited"
(Leviticus 16:22); so Satan, bearing the guilt of all the
sins which he has caused God's people to commit, will be for
a thousand years confined to the earth, which will then be
desolate, without inhabitant, and he will at last suffer the
full penalty of sin in the fires that shall destroy all the
wicked. Thus the great plan of redemption will reach its
accomplishment in the final eradication of sin and the
deliverance of all who have been willing to renounce evil."
1 Peter 2:21–24
21
For you have been
called for this purpose, since Christ also suffered for you,
leaving you an example for you to follow in His steps,
22whocommittednosin,
nor was any deceitfound in His mouth;
23and while being reviled, He did not revile in return;
while suffering, He uttered no threats, but kept entrusting
Himself to Him who
judges righteously;
24and He Himself bore our sins in His body on the cross,
so that we might die to sin and live to righteousness; for by
His wounds you were healed.
If a SDA follower believes Ellen G. White
teaching that our sins where placed on Satan. There is no hope
for them for it was Christ who bore the sins of the world.
(Is
53:11-12; John 1:29; Heb 9:28)
The Old Testament is to be understood
Christology
especially in the matters of salvation. Satan is the enemy of
man and not the savior or enabler of any work of salvation. It
would be to Satan's advantage to save souls thus avoiding
punishment all together if this teaching of Mrs. White was true.
Again Ellen G White has taught a doctrine in
the area of salvation that contradicts scripture and reflects
the insufficiency of Christ work of salvation. This teaching
reflects the slant of another gospel and the work of a different
Jesus. She even misrepresents the work of Satan himself, as
found in scripture..
One only
has to search the scriptures and look at church history to see if there is any
Biblical support that say God only use white men as
leaders. The answer is no.
It is clear from her (Ellen White)
teaching in
Testimonies for the Church Vol. 9. page 213-214 )
Ellen White taught that in order to further God's work
among colored people, it should be done by keeping
separation of white people from colored people and that
the status quo should remain as it is, for according to
her ,"No one is capable of clearly defining the proper
position of the colored people....", as she states in
the following:
"...No one is capable of
clearly defining the proper position of the
colored people. Men may advance theories, but I
assure you that it will not do for us to follow
human theories. So far as possible the color
line question should be allowed to rest.
The cities of the South are to be worked, and
for this work the best talent is to be secured,
and that without delay. Let white workers
labor for the white people, proclaiming the
message of present truth in its simplicity. They
will find openings through which they may reach
the higher class. Every opportunity for reaching
this class is to be improved.
Let
colored laborers do what they can to keep
abreast, working earnestly for their own
people I thank God that among the colored
believers there are men of talent who can work
efficiently for their own people, presenting the
truth in clear lines. There are many colored
people of precious talent who will be converted
to the truth if our colored ministers are wise
in devising ways of training teachers for the
schools and other laborers for the field.
The colored people should not urge that
they be placed on an equality with white people..."
Ellen White teaching promoted separation and the
racial status quo that existed in the United States
during her time, and Unfortunately to a
relative lesser degree it still exists today. White had no intention of being a Biblical
change agent within the culture during her time, but
sought more to promote her anti-Biblical stance and to
further her false doctrines. Her actions are
diametrically opposed to Biblical truth where believers
are to be the light (Matt 5;14-16) and salt (Matt
5:13) and to fellowship and love one for another. The
fruit of God in the life of the believer enables
believers to love and be at peace with one another (Matt 9:50,
Gal 5:22)
regardless of color.
Also God doesn't chose men based on their skin
color or human talent
but according to his purpose and will in which he equips
(1Cor 12:4-7) them to accomplish, for his power is
perfected in weakness not in some superior human talent. For weakness
is strength if Christ is in it. (1 Cor. 1:26–31)
It is also clear this move of Ellen White was
not part of a move of the Holy Spirit as depicted in
Acts 10 where Christ taught Peter a lesson about his
attitude toward gentiles in this case Cornelius.
Again Ellen White was willing to promote spiritual
apartheid in order to appease the false values
within the culture of her time, rather than stand for
the righteousness of God..
What Was Ellen White's
Expectation of the Hearers of Her Revelations as Written in
"Testimonies For The Church" ?
In 1867 Ellen stated:
"Although I am as
dependent upon the
Spirit of the Lord in writing my views as I am in receiving them,
yet the words I employ in describing what I have seen are my own."
(EGW, Selected Messages, 3 bks. (Washington: RHPA, 19585880), bk. l,
p. 37)
In 1876 EGWStated :
"In ancient times God spoke to men
by the mouth of prophets and apostles.
In these days
He speaks to them by the Testimonies of His Spirit." (EGW,
Testimonies
for the Church, vol. 4, pp. 147-148.)
In 1882 EGW stated:
"If you lessen the confidence of
God's people
in the testimonies He has sent them, you are
rebelling against God as certainly as were
Korah, Dathan, and Abiram." (Testimonies
for the Church, vol. 5, p. 66 -67. Testimony 31; 1882.)
It is clear from Ellen White's own writings
that she considered her visions equal to the Prophets of the Old
testament and the Apostles of the New Testament and herself rather
than Christ as the last revelation to the church. If one did not
recognize her writings as from God they where "
rebelling
against God" according to her. Despite the fact they clearly are in
opposition to scripture. Keep in mind she stated, "..."Although I am as
dependent upon the
Spirit of the Lord in writing my views as I am in receiving them..."
Though Ellen White says in her 'Testimonies,
"That the Testimonies were not given to take the place of the Bible"
(vol
5 p 663.1) she
clearly contradicts herself in other areas of 'The Testimonies' by
saying she is receiving her views from the "Spirit of the Lord"
(EGW, Selected Messages, 3 bks. (Washington: RHPA, 19585880), bk. l,
p. 37)
Thisshould be most
troubling for the one seeking to know the truth about Seventh Day
Adventist. This becomes a sticking point and a point of clarity
showing that Seventh Day Adventist nor the Reformed Adventist should
not be considered Christian
but cultic because of their allegiance to Ellen White, via her
anti-Biblical teachings mentioned in her 'Testimonies for the
Church'. These teaching are derived from her prophetic gift, in which she claims
revelations from God. of which contradicts scripture.
It is
crystal clear that the God of the Bible has a different message than
the God who provided Ellen White her revelations.
What is the Current Seventh Day
Adventist Teaching Concerning What Level of Authority
Ellen G White Teachings Should Have in the Life of the
Believer?
This questions is answered in
the Official doctrinal statement of the Seventh Day
Adventist and Reformed branch which
states:
" 18. The Gift of Prophecy:
One of the gifts of the Holy Spirit is prophecy.
This gift is an identifying mark of the remnant
church and was manifested in the ministry of Ellen.
G. White . As the Lord's messenger, her
writings are a continuing and authoritative source
of truth which provide for the church comfort,
guidance, instruction, and correction. They also
make clear that the Bible is the standard by which
all teaching and experience must be tested. (Joel
2:28, 29; Acts 2:14-21; Heb. 1:1-3; Rev. 12:17;
19:10.)."
The reformed Brach
of Seventh Day Adventist state the following:
Gift of Prophecy "The volumes of Spirit
of Prophecy and also the Testimonies should be
introduced into every Sabbath keeping family, and the
brethren should know their value and be urged to
read them."—Testimonies for the Church, vol. 4, p.
390.
It has already been
demonstrated that Ellen White gave many
false
prophecies/visions in her "Testimonies to the
Church". Yet the Seventh Day Adventist organization
including the reformed branch
still admonishes their members to look to her as a
source of truth. This again should be most troubling
for one seeking the truth about the Seventh Day
Adventist. This also is a blatant act of deception
on the organization's part to mislead so many in this
area.
Another Gospel / Another Jesus?
In
number 24 of the Seventh Day Adventist Belief statement the
following is stated:
24.
Christ's Ministry in the Heavenly Sanctuary:
There is a sanctuary in heaven, the true tabernacle
which the Lord set up and not man. In it Christ ministers on
our behalf, making available to believers the benefits of
His atoning sacrifice offered once for all on the cross. He
was inaugurated as our great High Priest and began His
intercessory ministry at the time of His ascension. In 1844,
at the end of the prophetic period of 2300 days, He entered
the second and last phase of His atoning ministry. It is a
work of investigative judgment which is part of the ultimate
disposition of all sin, typified by the cleansing of the
ancient Hebrew sanctuary on the Day of Atonement. In that
typical service the sanctuary was cleansed with the blood of
animal sacrifices, but the heavenly things are purified with
the perfect sacrifice of the blood of Jesus. The
investigative judgment reveals to heavenly intelligences who
among the dead are asleep in Christ and therefore, in Him,
are deemed worthyto have part in the first resurrection. It
also makes manifest who among the living are abiding in
Christ, keeping the commandments of God and the faith of
Jesus, and in Him, therefore, are ready for translation into
His everlasting kingdom. This judgment vindicates the
justice of God in saving those who believe in Jesus. It
declares that those who have remained loyal to God shall
receive the kingdom. The completion of this ministry of
Christ will mark the close of human probation before the
Second Advent. (Heb. 8:1-5; Heb 4:14-16; Heb 9:11-28; Heb 10:19-22; Heb 1:3; Heb 2:16, Heb 2:17; Dan 7:9-27; Dan 8:13-14Dan 9:24-27; Num 14:34; Eze 4:6; Lev 16:1-34; Rev 14:6-7, Rev 20:12; Rev 14:12; Rev 22:12.)
Click here to see the Seventh Day Adventist Reform doctrinal
statement. (Expanded version)
The above 'Seventh Day Adventist' doctrine of
'24.
Christ's Ministry in the Heavenly Sanctuary'
presents
a serious challenge to the historical Biblical doctrine of
salvation by grace through faith (Eph 2:8-9), specifically Christ's atoning work on the cross and has
strong implications that another Jesus is in view.
1.
This doctrine was the out growth of a failed prophecy
given by Baptist minster William Miller stating that their would be a literal
return of Christ to earth in 1844. This was know as "The Great
Disappointment". The following is a quotation from the
Ellen G White Estate website of how William Miller came to
the conclusion that Christ would literally return in 1844.
"Miller was a farmer, justice of the peace, sheriff, and
Baptist preacher, who, from 1831 to 1844, preached the
imminent return of Christ…
As a young man,
Miller was influenced by reading and association to become a
deist. This is a belief that God made the world and then
abandoned it to run according to certain natural laws.
Miller volunteered for service in the War of 1812, and while
in service saw evidences that there was a God, after all,
who intervenes in human affairs. After the war he was
converted and began a systematic study of the Bible to find
answers to his former questions. In the process he
discovered the prophecies of Daniel and Revelation,
especially
Daniel 8, which seemed to predict that Christ
would soon return to earth.
He finally
established through the process of applying the Bible
principle of a day for a year in prophecy, that Jesus would
come a second time about the year 1843.
At first he
said only that it would be "about 1843." He finally set an
ultimate time in the spring of 1844.”
Ellen White has
written positively about Miller in The Great Controversy and
elsewhere. She heard him preach, and accepted his teachings,
going through the disappointment at age 16. She believed
that his preaching fulfilled the prophecies of Scripture,
and saw him being guided by the Lord.
After the
disappointment of October 22, he wrote: "Although I have
been twice disappointed, I am not yet cast down or
discouraged. . . . I have fixed my mind upon another time,
and here I mean to stand until God gives me more light,--and
that is Today, TODAY, and TODAY, until He comes, and I see
Him for whom my soul yearns."--The Midnight Cry, Dec. 5,
1844, pp. 179, 180."[6]
From its
inception the Seventh Day Adventist foundation was that of
anti-Biblical, and false doctrine. The Bible is explicitly clear that date
setting for Christ second coming was futile for the timing was to be set by God the Father
himself. The very attempt to date set reflects
a contempt of God's authority.(Matt
24:36; Mark 13:32; Acts 1:7).
By adding dates that Jesus
said, "no one knows but the Father" is adding additional information
that God didn't give, in such a case God said he would prove you a
liar. (Deu 4:2; cf. Prov 30:6). Which is exactly what happen to William Miller
and those like him who continually set dates for Christ second
coming.
2. Seventh Day Adventist clearly teaches another
gospel, a gospel of works and not the gospel of grace (Eph 2:8-9) .
Notice the wording used in their doctrine 24.
Christ's Ministry in the Heavenly Sanctuary:
SDA Official
Doctrinal Statement
What the Bible States
24.
Christ's Ministry in the Heavenly Sanctuary:
There is a sanctuary in heaven, the true tabernacle
which the Lord set up and not man. In it Christ ministers on
our behalf, making available to believers the benefits of
His atoning sacrifice offered once for all on the cross. He
was inaugurated as our great High Priest and began His
intercessory ministry at the time of His ascension. In 1844,
at the end of the prophetic period of 2300 days, He entered
the second and last phase of His atoning ministry. It is a
work of investigative judgment which is part of the ultimate
disposition of all sin, typified by the cleansing of the
ancient Hebrew sanctuary on the Day of Atonement. In that
typical service the sanctuary was cleansed with the blood of
animal sacrifices, but the heavenly things are purified with
the perfect sacrifice of the blood of Jesus. The
investigative judgment reveals to heavenly intelligences who
among the dead are asleep in Christ and therefore, in Him,
are deemed worthyto have part in the first resurrection. It
also makes manifest who among the living are abiding in
Christ, keeping the commandments of God and the faith of
Jesus, and in Him, therefore, are ready for translation into
His everlasting kingdom. This judgment vindicates the
justice of God in saving those who believe in Jesus. It
declares that those who have remained loyal to God shall
receive the kingdom. The completion of this ministry of
Christ will mark the close of human probation before the
Second Advent. (Heb. 8:1-5; Heb 4:14-16; Heb 9:11-28; Heb 10:19-22; Heb 1:3; Heb 2:16, Heb 2:17; Dan 7:9-27; Dan 8:13-14Dan 9:24-27; Num 14:34; Eze 4:6; Lev 16:1-34; Rev 14:6-7, Rev 20:12; Rev 14:12; Rev 22:12.)
Click here to see the Seventh Day Adventist Reform doctrinal
statement. (Expanded version)
"Seventh day Adventist" state that:
"...He (Christ) entered
the second and last phase of His
atoning ministry. It is a
work of investigative judgment which is part of the
ultimate
disposition of all sin,..."
No where
does the Bible states there will be a second and last
phase to
Christ's atoning work. Christ death on the cross was a
finished one time work (John 19:30, Heb 9:11-12, 24-26).
The word atonement
(heb.
kaphar
pronouncned /kaw·far/)
means to to cover, purge, cleanse, purify, wipe off, cover, make reconciliation. This covering
of our sin and reconciliation to God was always on the basis
of shed blood (Matt 26:26–28) in which the animal
sacrificial system in the Old Testament (Exodus 29:33,
36, 30:10; Lev 4:20, 5:6) pointed to the work of Christ
on the cross where his blood was shed for the remission of
sin.
There was never an investigative judgment that was part
of the "Ultimate disposition of all sin", only the shed blood Christ.
To proclaim that there
was a second work in the atonement for sin creates anti-Biblical doctrines
that attack the sufficiency of Christ work on the cross by:
1. Implying that Jesus
sacrifice and shed blood on the cross was not sufficient in
itself, since
something other than his death and shed blood needed to be
accomplished for "...the ultimate disposition of all sin" .
The Bible says our sins are blotted out when we repent and
be converted (Acts
3:19). In addition the Bible also says Jesus one sacrifice and shed blood has
perfected for all time those who are sanctified.
Heb 10:11–14
11Every priest stands daily
ministering and offering time after time the same
sacrifices, which can never take away sins;
12but He, having offered one
sacrifice for sins for all time,
sat
down at the right
hand of God,
13waiting from that time onward
until Hisenemies be made a footstool for His feet. 14For by one offering He has
perfected for all time those who are sanctified.
It must be noted from Heb 10:14 that our perfection is based not on us
but the by Jesus alone. Not Jesus plus our good works. (keeping the commandments of God and the faith of
Jesus). The good works in the Christian life is the
result of salvation not by any means a way to obtain it.
The Bible also says that there will be no reference to
sin for those who eagerly await him
Heb 9:28
28 so Christ also, having
been offered once to bear the sins of many, will
appear a second time for salvation without reference
to sin, to those who eagerly await Him.
Because of Jesus shedding his blood we saved from the
wrath of God (Rom 5:9)
2. It also implies that our salvation to some degree is dependant
upon ourselves(deemed
worthy / keeping the commandments of God and the faith of
Jesus)plus faith
in Jesus Christ.This type
of teaching is a form of
Semi Pelagianism and which was a 5th century
heresy. This teaching was condemned at the Council of
Orange in 529AD.
The Bible clearly refutes a grace works salvation (John 6:2-29, Acts15:11; Eph
2:5-8; 2 Cor 8:9). 3. According to Seventh Day Adventist, "The
investigative judgment reveals to heavenly intelligences who
among the dead are asleep in Christ and therefore, in Him,
..., are ready for translation into
His everlasting kingdom."
Again no
where in scripture does it say that an investigative
judgment is needed to "...reveal in scripture
to heavenly intelligences who among the dead are asleep
in Christ and therefore, in Him, ..., are ready for
translation into His everlasting kingdom."
Jesus said in John 10:14: 14“I am the good shepherd, and I know My own and My own
know Me,
The Holy Spirit speaking through the
Apostle Paul said the following in 2Tim 2:19
19Nevertheless, the firm foundation of God stands,
having this seal, “The Lord knows those who are His,”
and, “Everyone who names the name of the Lord is to abstain
from wickedness.”
God has also set his seal on all those that are his, (2
Corinthians 1:21–22;
Ephesians 1:13; Ephesians 1:13)
One must not failed to forget that as God, Jesus
possess the attribute of omniscience or all knowing as well
as the other members (father, Holy Spirit) of the Godhead.
Thus leaving one with the fact that he doesn't need to
perform an Investigative Judgment to determine his own and
to see if they are ready for translation into His
everlasting kingdom. This statement begins to paint a
portrait different than the one that describes the God of
the Bible.
For the need of Christ to do an
investigative judgment would imply that the heavenly
intelligences of which the Father, Son, Holy Spirit are a
part of, do not posses the attribute of omniscience. Yet the
Bible says that God knows everything (Jer.
23:24; Heb. 4:12,13; Ps. 139:1-4;
John 2:24;
John 6:64). Yet
according to SDA it was not know who was by heavenly agencies until
1844. Either God is forgetful and or man can hide from God.
Conclusion
In investigating the relationship of the Seventh Day
Adventist with Ellen G. White, one is confronted with
the challenging duplicity of both Ellen G. White and the
Seventh Day Adventist organization. The fact that the
Seventh Day Adventist organization has as its point of
origin a foundation a false prophecy which gives it its
maiden voyage into the world of false religion.
This base of false doctrine is reinforced by other false
doctrines such as the "Investigative Judgment" and other false
teachings as found of Ellen G White in her "Testimonies for
the Church". The Seventh Day Adventist claim that,
"... As the
Lord's messenger, her writings are a continuing and
authoritative source of truth which provide for the church
comfort, guidance, instruction, and correction." It has been demonstrated she taught many false doctrine and
gave false prophecies and visions which contradicted.
Because the areas of false teaching opposed the
essential doctrines of historical Christianity such as (1)
Soteriology- salvation (2)
Christology - the study of
Christ. It is clear that Seventh day Adventist preach a
gospel of works plus grace and another Jesus. For this
reason they must be classified as a non Christian cult.
Thought the Seventh Day Adventist gives numerous
scriptures in an attempt to support their doctrine one only
has to look them up and note they are used out of context.
Sound hermeneutics plays no part in their teaching. This is
a typical practice in the arena of false religions as they go
about controlling and deceiving their followers.
Comment: Last
Update
09/15/2011 10:37 PM
Best Viewed with I.E. 6.0
Email "laymanpe@laymanperspective.com"
if you find
anything is doctrinally unsound, broken links or if you feel
there is a misrepresentation of the work or people mentioned on
this site
FAIR USE NOTICE: Some of the material
on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.
We are making this material available in its efforts to
advance the understanding of different issues related to
this site. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of
the copyrighted material as provided for in
Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107
of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use such
copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go
beyond 'fair use' you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.